Join us on Google + Join us

Posts Tagged ‘OFT’

New FCA to Regulate Consumer Credit?

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is facing calls from the Financial Services Consumer Panel to transfer control of consumer credit regulation to the new Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

The Financial Services Consumer Panel says the FCA, who will succeed the Financial Services Authority (FSA) upon enactment of the Financial Services Bill, should be given full responsibility for the regulation of retail financial services, including consumer credit. 

The Panel believes that a two stage process is necessary starting with the FCA taking over responsibility for regulating credit under the Consumer Credit Act.  A second review would  further examine when it would be appropriate to move to an integrated Financial Services and Markets Act-based regime.

Adam Phillips, the FSA Consumer Panel’s chairman said :

“If the FCA is an effective consumer regulator, they would be able to intervene in the issues we have seen developing. A single regulator looking at all the conduct issues in financial services has to be a good idea.”

Gillian Guy, the Citizens Advice chief, said:

“It is vital . . . that not only lenders but also debt collectors, brokers, debt managers and retail lenders selling insurance products are regulated by a single body.”

Director general of the FLA Stephen Sklaroff said:

“Whether or not regulation transfers to the new FCA, the regime which the FCA will inheritin the deposit and savings markets is not appropriate for credit.”

A spokesman for Which? said :

“Key protections in the Consumer Credit Act must be maintained.”

A spokesman for the OFT said:

“The government needs to consider the evidence and determine whether and where change is needed. We are engaging with the government about what improvements we think would make a difference.”

CSA to be Consulted in OFT Guidance for Debt Collectors

Wednesday, May 11th, 2011

In the forthcoming update to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) Guidance for Debt Collectors, which is expected in the latter part of the year, it has been announced that the Credit Services Association (CSA), who are the voice of the Debt Collection industry in the UK, will be consulted as a key stakeholder.

The CSA’s Code of practice, which was originally published in 2003, has had large parts of it’s content used as the basis for the new Guidance. It is expected that the new Guidance will have clearer instructions around data accuracy and a specific section dedicated to debt purchase according to CSA’s Head of Membership, Compliance and Educational Services, Claire Aynsley:

“It is vital that the consultation has insight from those in the collections and debt purchase sectors who have front line knowledge of collecting debts in often challenging conditions,” she says.

“Members of the CSA, and colleagues within the Debt Sale & Sellers Group (DBSG) will help ensure that any future Guidance is properly informed, so that best practice can be highlighted to the ultimate benefit of all parties.”

Debt management clean-up ordered

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

The OFT has told 129 debt management firms that they face losing their consumer credit licences unless immediate action is taken to comply with its Debt Management Guidance.

The firms are required to provide independently audited evidence within three months that action has been taken to address identified concerns. If evidence is not provided, the OFT will instigate licensing action.

The formal warnings follow an OFT review of the debt management sector, published today, which found widespread problems.

Debt management companies, which sit alongside free government-funded and charitable services, are fee-charging firms that provide advice and solutions to consumers with debt problems. The services they offer can include arranging IVAs, setting up debt management plans, and negotiating settlements with creditors.

Consumers contacting debt management companies tend to be over-indebted, vulnerable and desperate for help with managing their financial difficulties.

The key findings to emerge from the review, which included onsite compliance visits by Trading Standards Officers, a website sweep and a mystery shopping exercise, are that:

- misleading advertising is the most significant area of non-compliance, in particular failing to disclose a fee is retained by the business and misrepresenting debt management services as being free when they are not

- frontline advisers working for debt management companies are lacking in competence and are providing poor advice based on inadequate information

- there is low industry awareness of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) rules for resolving consumer complaints.

Today’s OFT report sets out a detailed action plan to improve standards across the industry, focusing on robust enforcement action against licensees that fail, or refuse, to change advertising and/or behaviour.

The OFT also plans to update its Guidance to take explicit account of new and emerging unfair business practices, and will work with the two main trade bodies, the Debt Managers Standards Association (DEMSA) and the Debt Resolution Forum (DRF) to support their initiatives to introduce higher standards into the industry.

Ray Watson, Director of the OFT’s Consumer Credit Group, said:

“People who are heavily indebted, desperate and vulnerable need advice which makes their problem better not worse and should not be exploited. Debt management firms must be clear about their charges and the options available to customers.

“The level of non-compliance we found across the industry is unacceptable. If any of the 129 firms identified do not improve their standards substantially they will be the subject of licensing action by the OFT.

“We are also looking to the two main industry bodies to lead the way in raising standards and to meet their commitments to make the industry more professional and responsible.”

Since April 2008 when the OFT obtained new powers under the Consumer Credit Act, it has taken 37 formal actions to impose requirements or refuse or revoke licences held or applied for by debt management businesses.

Other OFT actions have included shutting down websites, and addressing issues such as companies masquerading as charities, systemic cold-calling and the mis-selling of IVAs. It has also worked with Trading Standards to take injunctive action to stop ‘debt sale’ scams.

Michael Land, chairman of DEMSA said:

“DEMSA and its members fully support the OFT’s drive towards higher standards in the debt management sector.

“DEMSA members have long been committed to raising standards, indeed DEMSA is the only trade body in the sector to have received approval of its Code under the OFT’s Consumer Codes Approval Scheme.

“We will continue to work closely with the OFT to lead the drive towards higher standards and we are encouraged that the OFT has acknowledged the key role for DEMSA in doing so.”

OFT applies “home jurisdiction” rule to debt proceedings

Friday, June 18th, 2010

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has warned UK lenders that taking court action against consumers outside their home jurisdictions is unacceptable.

The move follows an OFT investigation into Creation Consumer Finance, which provides point of sale finance to major retailers.

Solicitors acting on behalf of the company had been issuing proceedings against Scottish debtors in English courts, and the OFT found the practice to be unfair stating: “The unfamiliar law and procedure involved in a court claim in a different jurisdiction, and any associated travel costs, may deter consumers from defending such action.”

The requirements imposed on Creation Consumer Finance Ltd mean that the company must:

Ensure that businesses and/or firms acting as its agent or sub-contractor in the course of any consumer credit licensable business comply with the OFT’s Debt Collection Guidance.

Not issue, and ensure that third parties acting on its behalf do not issue, proceedings against a consumer in a jurisdiction other than that in which the consumer is domiciled.

Any consumer credit licence holder taking action or threatening to take action against consumers in a court outside their home jurisdiction is therefore in breach of the OFT’s Debt Collection Guidance.

The watchdog’s director for consumer credit, Ray Watson, sums up: “Issuing proceedings in a different jurisdiction is clearly unacceptable and lenders should take heed that the OFT will act to prevent this practice.”

Investors in People logo Office of Fair Trading Website Information Commissioner's Office Website International Accreditation Board Website
Federation of European National Collection Associations Association of Credit and Collection Professionals logo Credit Services Association Website
Federal Management Debt Collection 4.8 based on 112 user reviews.